|
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE 1997 I No. 139
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
B E T W E E N :
- INDEPENDENT TELEVISION NEWS LIMITED
- PENNY MARSHALL
- IAN WILLIAMS
and
- INFORMINC (LM) LIMITED
- MICHAEL HUME
- HELENE GULDBERG
_____________________________________
REQUEST FOR FURTHER AND
BETTER PARTICULARS OF THE REPLY
_____________________________________
UNDER PARAGRAPH 2.3
Of: "(b) ·the depicted fence·formed part of an enclosure ("the enclosure")
within which the men were being detained·The enclosure was almost
entirely fenced in·"
Please specify:
- The approximate circumference of, or total length of the sides
of, the alleged enclosure;
- The approximate total length of the depicted fence;
- What "part" (i.e. in approximate length) of the said circumference/total
length of the said enclosure consisted of the depicted fence;
- (if 2. exceeds 3.) the nature and purpose of the remainder of
the depicted fence;
- Whether the depicted fence surrounded some other area;
- (if the answer to 5 is in the affirmative):
- the nature of that other area (indicating what, if anything, was
enclosed within it);
- whether the men were being filmed from that other area.
- Approximately how much (in length) of the said circumference/total
length of the enclosure in which the men were located, was not
"fenced".
Of: The whole of sub-paragraph (c)
Please specify:
- Whether it is admitted or denied that the Plaintiffs' reports
gave the impression that Fikret Alic was in an enclosed area surrounded
by the depicted barbed wire fencing (as alleged at paragraph 8
(viii) of the Defence);
- Whether Fikret Alic was "behind" or "in front of" the said depicted
fence (i.e. whether he was inside or outside of the area surrounded
by the fence).
Served the day of 1998 by Christian Fisher of 42 Museum
Street, Bloomsbury, London WCIA ILY, solicitors for the Defendants. |
