|
|
|
16 October 1996
New Labour: New Authoritarianism
While the Tories are still struggling with traditional repressive measures,
New Labour's success in invoking the spirit of the New Authoritarianism
is the key to its electoral ascendancy, argues Michael Fitzpatrick
The key event of the recent party conference season was the speech by the
representative of the Snowdrop Appeal, a Dunblane parent, at the Labour
conference in Blackpool. The first significant point about this speech was
that it was not made to the Tories at Bournemouth. Fearful of alienating
the party's rather feeble gun lobby, chairman Brian Mawhinney turned down
the approach from the anti-gun campaign. In the event the mawkish sentimentality
of a detailed account of the mass murder of infants at a Scottish primary
school won a prolonged ovation at the Labour conference and a sympathetic
response from the national television audience. The continuing national
obsession with this grisly event reflects a mood of morbid self-pity, from
which the Conservatives remain aloof, but to which New Labour has successfully
responded.
While the Tories prevaricate about tighter gun control, New Labour has no
hesitation about endorsing more restrictive regulations. The facts that
guns are already tightly regulated and that stricter laws will not prevent
psychopaths from getting hold of guns are of no concern to Blair and his
team. The point is to show that New Labour shares the prevailing sentiments
of fear and anxiety about the breakdown of social cohesion and the repressive
impulses which result from these sentiments.
Though New Labour has few distinctive policies, it has seized the moral
highground from the Tories on issues such as crime, education, the family
and has forced them to respond. In all these areas, New Labour's instinct
for responding to middle class anxieties is carried through into measures
which invariably involve the extension of state authority into the life
of society. The plan to make denial of the Holocaust a criminal offence
is a typical of New Labour's new authoritarianism. A moralistic posture
against an idiot fringe is used to justify repressive legislation with far-reaching
coercive consequences.
Meanwhile, the Conservatives are offering electronic tagging for juvenile
delinquents and more workfare. While some of their proposals - such as Michael
Howard's plan for confiscating driving licences from offenders - appear
simply impracticable, others are just more of the same sort of penal policies
- like the short sharp shock bootcamps for young offenders - which have
already conspicuously failed to bring results. With their plans for paedophiles
and legislation against stalkers, the Tories are clearly trying to connect
with the more fashionable contemporary preoccupations, but they lack New
Labour's more mediated approach.
At the end of the conference season, New Labour seems on course for election
victory over the Conservatives. The party conferences confirm the ascendancy
of style over substance (all proclaim unity, but unity around what?) and
of personality over policy (though charisma is conspicuously lacking). They
also confirm the narrowing of the sphere of politics and the increasing
aloofness of the major parties from society. The absurd reversal of traditional
alignments implicit in Blair's appeals to the City and business, while Major
postures as the man of the people, illustrates the party leaders' remoteness
from the social bases of their own parties.
Though both parties are riven by internal tensions, New Labour's sense of
impending electoral victory has successfully suspended factional strife
- at least until the election. On the other hand, the Tories' sense of impending
defeat has only served to intensify the forces of fragmentation so unconvincingly
pressed into a show of unity at Bournemouth. The Conservatives are an ageing
and exhausted party in which the only real debate is about the direction
and leadership it will follow after its coming defeat.
The character of the coming election campaign is well anticipated in The
Point Is to Change It, Living Marxism's recently published manifesto. While
the mainstream party political contest is likely to leave many people cold,
our concern is to challenge the notions of low expectations and the spirit
of caution and restraint that are shared by all the major parties. In particular
we need to challenge the authoritarian dynamic that is the real danger of
New Labour as it heads towards government office.
Join a discussion on this commentary
|
|
|
|