|
|
|
Ann Bradley
Teenage tragedy
It's open season on teenage mothers again. In July Welsh secretary John
Redwood announced his shock at discovering that on some Cardiff housing
estates young women have babies 'with no apparent intention of even trying
marriage or a stable relationship with the father of the child'. Days later,
health minister Tom Sackville chose the anniversary of the publication of
the Health of the Nation report to complain that the provision of
council housing and welfare benefits had encouraged teenage mothers.
Banging on about teenage mothers must be preferable to tackling the real
problems of the health of the nation (like the under-resourcing of hospitals
and primary healthcare). It also provides an opening to stick the boot into
morally lax liberals, and an excuse to cut the already pitiful levels of
welfare provision.
In the simple minds of ministers, the growing problem of teenage single-motherhood
is caused by the benefit system (which pays on average £70 to a single
parent of one child) and by 'feminists' who say it's OK for women to bring
up kids on their own. Muzzle the feminists, cut the benefits, recreate a
moral climate where young women are chastised for having sex and the problem's
solved.
Unfortunately the liberal response to this reactionary onslaught is pretty
feeble. It usually centres on a denial that young girls get pregnant in
order to get council flats, or an insistence that teenage pregnancies are
unwanted and that better access to contraception and sex education is the
solution.
It may well be the case that many young people are ignorant about how they
can and can't get pregnant, and it's certainly true that they need better
access to the contraceptive method of their choice. But the teenage pregnancies
which the government is concerned about involve teenagers whose pregnancies
are intended and wanted - by the girl, if not her partner.
Most young people have sex for fun. Teenagers in shire villages experiment
with it just like teenagers on run-down, inner-city estates. But while it
remains recreational for middle class teenagers, it tends to become procreational
for working class ones. A recent article in the British Medical Journal
points out that a pregnancy to a middle class girl usually ends in an
abortion, while a pregnancy to her working class contemporary typically
ends in a birth. The reasons why are pretty obvious.
There are clear incentives for Rebecca and Beatrice to remain unpregnant - the
chance to travel, a place at university, career prospects. Middle class
teenagers have ambitions and a chance to fulfil them. By contrast, what
does life offer a 17-year old woman on the housing estates of inner London,
Cardiff or Liverpool?
What reason does a girl from those grim concrete cities have to avoid getting
pregnant? There is no decent job for her to go to, no prospect of financial
or social independence. At least a baby gives her some status, a transition
into an adult world, access to a (miserly) independent income and the chance
to escape from her parents home to one of her own.
If single-motherhood appears attractive to young working class women it
is because they have no prospect of doing anything more significant with
their lives. Ask any 13-year old girl what she wants to be when she's 17
and you won't find one who aspires to being a teenage mother. She wants
a job, a wage, a nice boyfriend, friends and a hectic social life. Motherhood
only becomes attractive when it's compared to living out your unemployed
days in your mum's flat with no income to call your own.
There's a singular perversity in the way that the Tories blame everyone
from liberal teachers and social workers to the working class for the rising
numbers of young single mothers. In reality, the government itself is responsible.
After all, whose fault is it if young women have nothing better to aspire
to than the domestic drudgery that a young baby brings? Who's to blame if
there are no jobs from which working class women can earn a decent living?
It's certainly not the fault of the young women. Their ambitions and aspirations
are crushed by their experiences at the receiving end of government social
policy. If the government is looking for a reason for the rise in teenage
pregnancy it needs look no further than the consequences of its own policies
which have left many with no hope for the future.
Working class women don't need a moral lead, they need a chance to live.
Reproduced from Living Marxism issue 58, August 1993
|
|
|
|