LM Archives
  11/5/00
  11:19 am GMT
LM Commentary Review Search
Comment Current LM Web review Mailing
lists Discuss Chat Events Search Archives Subject index Links Merchandise Overview FAQ Feedback Toolbar
 

A 'dog bites dog' story

Tessa Myer watches the Tory press attacking the Tory government

'Dear Mr Major, do you have a plan to get us out of this bloody mess?' - Sun editorial....'When are you going to resign, you hopeless little git?'--Sun columnist Richard Littlejohn on Major....'The chancellor is wrong. The government is wrong.'--Daily Express editorial....'This government is losing its marbles.' - Bernard Ingham, Daily Express....'Mr Major...looks weak. He is weak.'--The Times editorial....The people are 'lions led by donkeys'--Sunday Telegraph....

A measure of politeness and servility is the usual tone adopted by the Tory press in its coverage of the Tory government. But no more. During the rows over everything from the miners to Maastricht, relations degenerated into a slanging match. Normally, when the Tory Party blames the media for its troubles, it's the BBC that gets the flak. This time Tory MPs are turning on their fair-weather friends in the newspapers.

The Tory press has been accused of worsening, if not causing the splits within the government. Fighting for his political life, David Mellor cried out 'who decides who should be a member of the British cabinet - the prime minister or the editor of the Daily Mail?' (Daily Mail, 25 September). He blamed the crisis on 'a barrage of tabloid stories'.

The fact that editors from the Tory tabloids to the Times are lashing out against the government's lack of leadership shows the scale of crisis within the British establishment. Gentlemanly rules between Tory Party HQ and editors' offices have been rewritten as a string of four letter words. The Tory press has become the Tory Party's worst PR agent - and they know where it hurts.

However, the response by the Tory press to the government's political incompetence has been as confused and troubled as the Tory Party itself.

The Sun has revealed its utmost contempt for John Major's gutless leadership by presenting him as a root vegetable on the front page, under the heading 'U Turn-ip'. This is the newspaper that originally championed the Tory Party agenda in the eighties and reserved its turnip jokes for England football manager Graham Taylor when England lost to the Swedes.

The Sun now champions the small man against insensitive government policies. 'Newspapers are the voice of the people.' (Sun, 24 October) 'We fight for your rights', proclaims the newspaper that has previously agreed with the government that unemployment is a price worth paying for Britain. These days, the Sun often sounds as if it is setting itself up as an alternative to the Tory Party. Perhaps Gary Bushell will run for the leadership next time.

The Tory papers have been flailing about as wildly as Tory MPs for something meaningful to say. While criticising government policies, the Daily Mail is involved in U-turns of its own. It regretted that 'Lamont will have to go' (2 October), then two weeks later congratulated the chancellor, who had followed the Mail's advice to cut interest rates. The Mail can no longer even whip up enthusiasm for the Citizen's Charter, which it hailed as a visionary manifesto during the election campaign. Now it asks, 'What is the use of sacks of citizen's charters to the millions who want work and who don't know how they can pay the mortgage?'.

Some pundits have carried a more elitist but equally alarmist line. Their criticisms of the government are designed not simply to blame the nearest Tory politician or his personal inadequacies, but to emphasise the implications of the present crisis for the stability and coherence of the Tory establishment as a whole.

William F Deedes, former Daily Telegraph editor and Tory Party grandee, has voiced concern at the lack of press support for the government. He has called for a 'rough balance to be struck' between the papers and the cabinet: 'We of the media have every right to call upon ministers to make fresh assessments. We also have, I think, one or two of our own to make.' (Daily Telegraph, 20 October) The Daily Mail has also warned that 'there's a world of difference between teaching the government a lesson and kicking it when it's down' (Daily Mail, 20 October).

Meanwhile, the Daily Express has sprung to the defence of the innocent - John Major and Norman Lamont. It's the 'grey men' of the treasury who have 'presided over the shambles of Britain's economic policy' (18 October), and Tory rebels are simply a'ragtag band of political headbangers'.

Amid the chaos, the Express at first tried to carry on describing the prime minister in robust terms as 'Sergeant Major' (8 September) who was 'not for turning' (11 September). That was before the changes of policy over the ERM and pit closures. When those U-turns came, Express chief Lord Stevens of Ludgate sought to blame the mistakes on the prime minister's 'cronies and buddies', rather than Major himself (21 October), while his paper ended up defending the indefensible. 'The government has painfully but successfully blundered towards the right way of handling this most difficult issue' (22 October). Sounds more like the Express has blundered towards making what's rotten smell of roses.

The divisions within the establishment are reflected by infighting among the Tory papers. In response to Mellor's vitriolic attack on its loyalty, the Mail declared that all of the Tory newspapers had contributed to the down-fall of a cabinet minister. The Daily Telegraph criticised the Times for publishing a shallow piece of journalism on John Major's loneliness and feeble character. Now Simon Heffer, Spectator columnist, is under attack from former Spectator literary editor Ferdinand Mount for calling the PM a 'berk'.

Many people believe that a monolithic Tory media is all-powerful in setting the political mood. However the recent rows and confusion within the Tory press reveal that the media reflects the wider political climate rather than dictating it.

Back in the eighties, a bold, confident Tory government gave the lead to papers like the Sun and the Mail. They could sing the praises of the British economy and hammer the 'loony left'. Today, by contrast, the crisis within the Tory press reflects the establishment's problems of economic slump and political incoherence, as editorials contradict each other and analysis gives way to rude remarks about politicians and other commentators.

The rewriting of the rules of engagement between the Tory press and the Tory Party shows the weakness of old alliances in the face of the new crisis. There are few loyalties to losers. The more elitist Tory papers can hardly disguise their shock at the inadequacy of cabinet ministers. The one thing which prevents them going even further in their attacks is the lack of answers to the question worriedly posed by the Daily Mail on 4 November: within the Tory Party, 'what is the alternative to backing John Major?'.

U Turn-ip: Major as seen by the Sun
Reproduced from Living Marxism issue 50, December 1992
 
 

 

http://www.informinc.co.uk/LM/LM50/LM50_Press.html

Mail: webmaster@mail.informinc.co.uk